Sunday, November 23

Impact of Capital (versus Operating) lease for lessee on financial ratios

Item Impact
CFO Higher (more +ve) Part of lease payment shifted to CFF (under Operating Lease, all lease payment->CFO)
CFF Lower (more -ve) Part of lease payment shifted to CFF
Net cash position No impact CFO and CFF balance out
Assets Higher Due to lease asset
Liabilities Higher Due to lease liability
Equity No impact
Depreciation Higher Due to lease asset depreciation
Interest expense Higher Due to lease liability
Net income Lower Lower now, higher later
Profitability (ROA)Lower Lower NI higher assets
Leverage (Debt/Equity)Higher Higher liability, lower equity
Liquidity (Current ratio)No impact No change in CR or CL
Asset turnover Lower Due to higher assets
Operating income higher as depreciation always lower than lease payment (reason: depreciation is only based on PV of all lease payment). Total income over the lease life is same for both as sum (lease payment)= sum(depreciation +interest expense). But in early years, as interest expense is higher than later years due to amortization loan, net income is lower for CL in early years.

Financial reporting from the lessor’s perspective:
· The lessor can take the lease asset off its balance if it meets one of the four criteria for capital lessee {see above}, and two further criteria:
· The Minimum Lease Payments (MLPs) are reasonably certain to be collected and
· No significant uncertainties exist regarding the reimbursement of costs incurred by the lessor under the lease contract. If these criteria are not met, the lessor must retain the underlying assets on its balance sheet. If they are met, the lease must be treated as salestype or direct financing type lease.

No comments: